Police Officer charged

MW

Well-Known Member
Legendary 10 Years
..The police officer who handled the Suntec City brawl incident in 2010 has been charged with neglect of duty.

Second Minister for Home Affairs, and Trade and Industry S Iswaran said the Singapore Police Force (SPF) has completed its internal inquiry, and charged the investigation officer who handled the case with negligence. A letter of warning has also been issued to his supervisor, S Iswaran informed the House during Tuesday's Parliament.

“I would also point out that the lapse was due to the error of an individual rather than to any systematic shortcomings,” S Iswaran said, answering Member of Parliament (MP) Tin Pei Ling’s question for an update on the police inquiry.

This is after two of the three expatriates -- options brokers New Zealander Robert Stephen Dahlberg and Briton Robert James Springall – absconded while on bail after they were charged with assault in July 2010. A third man, Australian business development manager Nathan Robert Miller, 35, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to three weeks’ jail in February this year.

The trio were allegedly drunk when they attacked two taxi drivers and two taxi passengers and hijacked and crashed a taxi in April 2010, reported AsiaOne. Dahlberg allegedly caused hurt to businessman Laurence Wong Seong and shoved Paul Louis Liew Kai Ming against a pillar, who sustained a forehead gash and a broken nose. Miller had also allegedly punched cabby Tay Gek Heng in the face during the incident.

While Miller served time, his friends Dahlberg, 34, and Springall, 25, were allowed to leave Singapore after they were charged.

Dahlberg was out on bail for S$25,000 last July when he went on trips to London and Hong Kong and did not return. Springall, travelled back to the United Kingdom between August and September on a bail of $12,000. After returning from his trip, Springall failed to surrender his passport to the authorities and flew out of Singapore in December 2011 and absconded.

Both men jumped bail and warrants of arrest have been issued to the police’s overseas counterparts and the Interpol.

In light of the incident, MP David Ong asked during Parliament whether the Penal Code and other criminal legislation are sufficiently adequate to protect Singaporeans from offences and crimes committed by foreigners against them.

In response, S Iswaran said that all accused persons and victims are treated equally under Singapore law, whether they are Singaporeans or foreigners.

“When setting bail conditions, the police and the courts take a variety of factors into account to assess the flight risk of the accused. These include the gravity of the offence, the extent of the accused person’s roots in Singapore and whether the person have attempted to abscond previously,” S Iswaran said.

Iswaran also explained that when a person absconds, the bail is forfeited and the police will arrest the wanted person if he is still in Singapore. In the event that the accused person flees overseas, the police may issue an Interpol Red Notice.

Police forces in the Interpol member states will then help to locate and arrest the accused person and may extradite the person back to Singapore.

Tin also asked if further the impounding of passports should be made a standard operating procedure in cases as it "would ensure that when the courts need them or when judgment is made, they are in Singapore to receive the judgment".

Responding to Tin, Iswaran said, "This is really a decision that we should leave to the courts and not make it mandatory, because there are so many considerations here. The nature of the crime, the gravity of the impact, the nature of the individuals' own ties to Singapore."

"And I think most importantly and fundamentally, we have to strike that balance between his or her right to freedom to move before he or she is judged or found to be guilty," he added.

Source: Yahoo News



Now the 1st thing that came to my mind was...from September to December, why didn't the police get Springall to surrender his passport even tho there was a 3 month lapse before he run road?
..
 
Re: Police Officer charged

becos he FT mah .... special one
 
Re: Police Officer charged

No justice one la. Double standard all the way.
 
Re: Police Officer charged

Under what circumstances should the passports be impounded?
 
Re: Police Officer charged

Next thing we know, the pillar that the Ang Mo shoved the two men against will be charged. For failing to siam and hence causing injury to the two men.

Everything is everyone else's fault la.
 
Re: Police Officer charged

Btw those run road one are lucky that I am not Batman or Spiderman. Or else I sure tie them up and hang on the simi sky garden on MBS.
 
Re: Police Officer charged

No head no tail. Why was the sole police officier charged? From my neutral standpoint, what could he have done to stop 4 hooligans from bashing up people? Draw his gun and point?

I still think this is a convenient way for Govt to shove responsibility and in denial. Cannot find answer to why the scuffle broke out uncontrollably? Charge the officier. Why did the FT hooligans jumped bail successfully? No idea, our immigration dept is solid so that is not possible. Why can't we impound their passports? Don't know, let's leave it to the courts to decide. Why haven't these bastards been captured and put to justice? Don't know, ask Interpol. We asked for warrants already..

But Govt is quick to add: ALL RESIDENTS LOCAL OR FOREIGNERS ARE TREATED EQUALLY IN COURT. Nbz... too scared to offend too many foreigners in Spore, resulting in departures and spoiling their cash cow? But not scared of local citizens removing them in 2016? This case is causing so much bad sentiments on the locals vs foreigners issue. As if the Romanian ambassador case isn't enough? When can the govt take some real actions instead of pushing issues around?
 
Re: Police Officer charged

As a layperson, this article is totally incoherent and suggests that it was heavily edited.

So the police officer who handled the case was charged with neglect of duty. What penalty is he facing?

Second, the minister stated that impounding of passport is considered on a case-by-case basis and whether the person is a "flight risk". Asked whether impounding of passports should be made mandatory to eliminate ambiguity, the answer is no and should be "left to the courts". Implying that the police force has no authority to impound the passport and has to apply to the court to do so.

So... if you were the IO, how in the world would you determine if the person is a "flight risk" or not? And why should the IO get the blame if the court determines the suspect is not a flight risk, yet he absconds?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Police Officer charged

Thats why if u kenna hoot by foreigners in similar situations, faster take out ur handphones..not to call police but to mao those cb kias
 
Re: Police Officer charged

MW;850184 said:
Thats why if u kenna hoot by foreigners in similar situations, faster take out ur handphones..not to call police but to mao those cb kias

iphone screen might crack if take to hoot ang mo.....
 
Re: Police Officer charged

C3P0;850166 said:
Next thing we know, the pillar that the Ang Mo shoved the two men against will be charged. For failing to siam and hence causing injury to the two men.

Hmm not if the pillar is connected to say, a lightning rod. The police officer in this case is like the window at Whitley Road Detention Centre... no connections, hence an easy scapegoat.
 
Re: Police Officer charged

Crufty Dusty;850183 said:
And why should the IO get the blame if the court determines the suspect is not a flight risk, yet he absconds?

I think you ask a very good point here. Someone else mentioned that the news article appears heavily edited seems true too. I could not understand what the MP is trying to drive at.

Was corruption insinuated here and hence the officers were reprimanded? It raises more questions than answers.
 
Re: Police Officer charged

How did they come to the conclusion that “lapse was due to the error of an individual rather than to any systematic shortcomings”? Such a flippant remark, with no basis.

Was there anything the IO could have done, according to the system in place, that would have led to the some sort of action to impound the passports?
 
Re: Police Officer charged

Mockngbrd;850232 said:
if suspect has pink ic

wa ha ha, nb.
 
Re: Police Officer charged

the inspector kana charged , what charges is that ?
nb. i siam IPPT 3 years ,go back ICT kana charged $50 only wat...
 
Re: Police Officer charged

matrock;850278 said:
the inspector kana charged , what charges is that ?
nb. i siam IPPT 3 years ,go back ICT kana charged $50 only wat...

I think yu are suppose to drop 50 and not fifty dollars? :offtopic:
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
82,791
Messages
1,019,505
Members
78,670
Latest member
oxbett2com
Back
Top