pengful;789653 said:A few years ago, I argued against these illegal parkers near some places of worship (not temples or churches) with reference to a summon I received for parking at a quiet road on a Sunday morning. I lost.
There is definitely a bias.
MW;790077 said:Sedition law applies only if any posting is intended to incite racial disharmony or calculated to incite disruption of the peace or disunity, whether social, political or religious.
I believe if we honestly raise senstive issues not to stir but to invite an academic empirical evidence based discussion, then sedition does not apply.
Eg:
Why is it I see many illegal parking outside mosques on Fridays but no LTA enforcement? Tats not sedition
But if u add in "....but I see wardens busy issuing summons against illegal parkers outside XXX church every Sunday?" Tats sedition
The 1st question is an innocent question based on observation
The 2nd question implies preferential treatment and may incite religious disharmony
MW;790077 said:Sedition law applies only if any posting is intended to incite racial disharmony or calculated to incite disruption of the peace or disunity, whether social, political or religious.
I believe if we honestly raise senstive issues not to stir but to invite an academic empirical evidence based discussion, then sedition does not apply.
Eg:
Why is it I see many illegal parking outside mosques on Fridays but no LTA enforcement? Tats not sedition
But if u add in "....but I see wardens busy issuing summons against illegal parkers outside XXX church every Sunday?" Tats sedition
The 1st question is an innocent question based on observation
The 2nd question implies preferential treatment and may incite religious disharmony
satinGHOST|r!der;790087 said:You are actually smarter than you look you know...