60 men may be charged

Re: 60 men may be charged

jasonmaxima;795695 said:
just DON'T do it....

+ 10000. (on behalf of Hitmee also.)
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

One session 850 dollars multiply by 44 men... She made 37k. Is that amount taxable? Bro care to comment?
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

no cos under the law its an illegal contract and IRAS cannot tax you on an illegal contract.

Please thank me for my quality post
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

No tax mean Ho Say Liao... Can buy LV GUCCI CHANEL bags liao...
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

not exactly, as the money was earned through immoral means and illegal under the law, the money may be confiscated if there is any left.
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

Robot can run quite fast


client01.jpg
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

Why isn't these taking of photo a breach of privacy?

They have not been found guilty yet.
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

hitmee;795909 said:
i have to cut off at 41 out of respect to my bro


raymond.

Sorry my ang moh not very good. What is the thing you are going to cut off when you reach 41?
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

rumour one of them involved is a fund mgr who quit last week.
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

I am not a lawyer but if a girl lie about her age and the clients have no reason to doubt her age (supported by her C cup asset, mature looks and superb skills with high suction power), then the law should not find the clients guilty but should charge the underage girl for fraud...The clients should be able to seek for refund and compensation for all the suffering & trauma felt...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: 60 men may be charged

if the girl was "selling" at geylang "licensed" house and says >18 yrs old (assuming pimp/operator also lied = in this case the vice ring leader)
will the 41 men been charged? mw/kenn what say you

zorro;795939 said:
I am not a lawyer but if a girl lie about her age and the clients have no reason to doubt her age (supported by her C cup asset, mature looks and superb skills with high suction power), then the law should not find the clients guilty but should charge the underage girl for fraud...The clients should be able to claim for refund and seek compensation for all the suffering & trauma felt...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: 60 men may be charged

zorro said:
I am not a lawyer but if a girl lie about her age and the clients have no reason to doubt her age (supported by her C cup asset, mature looks and superb skills with high suction power), then the law should not find the clients guilty but should charge the underage girl for fraud...The clients should be able to claim for refund and seek compensation for all the suffering & trauma felt...

< 16, 376A, max 10 years and/or fine, regardless whether consensual, commercial....

>16 but pimp kenna too.
 
Re: 60 men may be charged

So in your Duck/Goose business, you require your female clients to produce ICs regardless they looked 16 or 80 years old?? Is that your SOP??


kenntona;795948 said:
< 16, 376A, max 10 years and/or fine, regardless whether consensual, commercial....

>16 but pimp kenna too.
 
Back
Top