Chagrin;1050296 said:I fully agree. I think I will drive this car till the COE expires. 1) because the cost of a new car is crazy nowadays 2) there isn't another car that beats the S65 unless we include the supercars (which is a whole different discussion altogether)
reardriven;1050346 said:Same sentiments. M3 is currently my longest love affair. Reliability tops the prev BMWs I've owned too
Chagrin;1050296 said:I fully agree. I think I will drive this car till the COE expires. 1) because the cost of a new car is crazy nowadays 2) there isn't another car that beats the S65 unless we include the supercars (which is a whole different discussion altogether)
zzt231;1051299 said:E9x m3 says to its succeeding bros "easier for me to be you than for you to be me."
Its the most practical super car with 8 itb. Only connoiseurs will appreciate. Guess thats one chapter into history. Like the bmw m1 and the nsx type r and toyota supra and lfa.
zzt231;1051329 said:Few na super cars will behind a signature roar. The only other car with a really haunting and ecstatic roar is the lfa. It has a f1-esque note with a yamaha accent to it and you know it without having to see it. What a shame that these na are heading the dino way.
Once my neighbour remarked that the e9x m3 has a cool exhaust to it. His other comment about the car is not the engine sound.... And ironically, it was the amount of road tax vs his e92 325...
I agree too and its an irony.... Driving this car is more "economic" than changing it.
totoseow;1051394 said:r u serious? this is not a supercar...n u cant compare with the m1 or nsx n supra or LFA...
much prefer the e46 M3s for look as well as weight and feel. much easier to achieve weight transfers. the E92 is a good car but not a great. but way too heavy and too low on torque.
chiongster;1052834 said:It seems all boils down to cost efficiency. These days a single engine design can be installed in many different models. No disrespect to audi but a 2.0 TFSI engine can be found in A4, A5, A6, etc