The “ I ” In E.F.I

The “ I ” In EFI

Very high demands are placed on Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI) equipped engines with regards to: Starting, Performance, Drivability, Fuel consumption and Exhaust gas values. Fuel Injectors have a decisive influence upon ALL of these characteristics, and must therefore comply with stringent quality standards. Essentially the following factors must be considered.

1. Precise fuel delivery at all rpm ranges.
2. Good linearity, the difference in fuel delivery between the injectors must not exceed the specific tolerance value.
3. Good dynamic flow range. (Pulsation)
4. Good fuel distribution and fuel atomisation.
5. Valve closing and seating to prevent fuel drip or leak.

The Injector Valve has the finest tolerances of any mechanical component on the engine.
We are constantly checking Milliseconds, Milivolts and Milliamps. When do we check Millilitres? Un-burnt fuel is the biggest issue on the petrol combustion engine today, how often do we check the Millilitres of Fuel delivered?

We change Air Filters, Oil Filters and Fuel Filters, how often do we change Injector Filter? The fact is all filters are meant to be choked with contaminants and to be replaced within certain period. Clean balanced injectors are a key to performance and fuel economy in any EFI engines. (Car, Motorcycle, Marine, etc)

Engine Related Problems, Recognise the Symptoms

1. Starting Problems - Difficult to start, hot or cold or will not start at all.
2. Poor Fuel Economy - Vehicle has good performance, but excessive fuel consumption.
3. Excessive Exhaust Emission - Inspection failure on exhaust emissions and no adjustment is available. Lambda or Catalyst exhausts failure.
4. Idling Problems - Erratic and uneven idling and adjustment or cleaning to idling valve fails to resolve problem.
5. Lacking Performance - Lack of power, flat spots, poor throttle response, car not performing like it should or use to be.
6. Poor Drivability - The car hesitates, jerking, pinging under load, erratic performance and throttle response.
7. Check Engine (MIL) Fault Codes - Error code shows fault with Lambda or Air/Fuel mixture and physical checks show no fault.

On the latest generation of Lambda(O2 Sensor) controlled, Fuel Injected Engine Management Systems(OBD-II), correct diagnosis of the complete system is no longer an option, it’s a requirement. As these systems are using “Closed Loop” design where all the components in the system contribute to the engines correct and efficient running, then the correct diagnostic programme should cover all the components related to the complete Engine Management System, not just some of them.

The Fuel Injectors and their individual performance are now one of the major components to look into when diagnostically and analysing any system for “combustion related” problems, especially if problem is relating to Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Exhaust
Pollution, Lambda or Catalyst failure. Another type of EFI engine on the market is Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) engines. These engines are running extremely lean air fuel ratio, up to 40:1 at times and placing the GDI injectors in the combustion chamber has already started to cause a problem from day 1 onwards, due to the fact that the most dirty part of the engine is the combustion chamber.

ASNU(Pronounced as “As New”), have created a system called “Injector Diagnostics”, a Testing & Servicing programme where the Injectors Valve Seating, Coil Dynamic Resistance, Fuel Distribution, Fuel Droplet Formation, Fuel Atomisation and Fuel Delivery, are all visually, physically checked and tested as a starting point rather than a last resort. The injectors will be cleaned using a special biodegradable liquid and ASNU’s custom tuned Ultrasonic bath. The rubber sealing o-rings, plastic protection caps and filter baskets are replaced before re-testing, ensuring all the injectors are performing as a matched, balanced set. The before and after results will be presented in a detailed report sheet to the owner or mechanic.

Without “Injector Diagnostics”, it is impossible for workshops to correctly, economically or efficiently solve problems with Fuel Injected engines. Servicing Injectors will also save time and money on Service and Repair bills, prolong the life of Inlet & Exhaust Valves, Piston Compression Rings, Lambda/Oxygen Sensors and the Catalytic Exhaust System.

ASNU is approved World Wide by Robert Bosch GmbH and Delphi Automotive.

Chemical Cleaning, Fact not Fiction

These additives also coat the internal components of the injector, restricting the fuel flow and pintle travel. The coating also increases the surface tension as the fuel exits the injector, causing a drag effect and by doing so, creating a larger droplet of fuel.

They are more likely to clean up the fuel tank than anything else in the fuel system. Loosening up dirt in the tank and choking up your fuel filter, which causes it to bypass fuel without proper filtration. This places more dirt in the injector filter baskets and restricting fuel further.

The “Better Performance Effect” these chemicals provides, if present, only last for that tank of refill. The “pour into the tank” chemical cleaning craze has never been expected to progress to this kind of level. You can find dozens of such chemicals on the shelves if you have been to an automotive supermarket in Japan and USA or even locally. Even fuel companies like Caltex, Honda, 3M also sells them on the market. Then of course some of them even shows you the before and after pictures claiming to “clean” combustion chambers, intake valves and fuel injectors. It will never happen and the improvements are largely due to the upper cylinder lubrication these cleaners has. The best F.I cleaners I have ever used did improved the performance of my engine slightly but I guess it is partly due to the long drive up to KL. Long drives works better than any cleaning agents available on the market as it clears the excess carbon away from the combustion chamber! However, cars running on carburettors will see some benefits with these in-tank chemicals. The main reasons why in-tank cleaners don’t work on injector is simple. Number 1, Fuel will be spraying outwards in a cone shape, the pintle that regulates the fuel flow is practically untouched by the fuel. Number 2, there is no way the filter basket inside the injector can be cleaned and they need to be replaced with a new one. Assuming they do have some cleaning effects, what makes you think all 4 or 6 injectors will be 100% cleaned? If they are not individually 100% cleaned do not even bother to clean them in the first place, we will touch on that later.

In-tank cleaners is either too low in concentration or too heavy which fouls up your expensive sparkplugs. It seems like all automotive sectors recognises the problem of dirty injectors which resulting in bad combustion, poor performance and higher fuel consumption. However, instead of providing a solution to the problem they are profiteering from products that don’t work and even add on to the problem. The only solution to a set of clean, balanced set of fuel injector is to introduce the Injector Servicing Program into our scheduled vehicle servicing intervals. The only machine that can do this properly is of course by ASNU.

OBD2 ECU & F.I Relationship

Our modern engine management system or OBD2 ECU will be constantly monitoring the final combustion gases in the exhaust system to ensure optimum fuel economy and emission control. The reading taken using an Oxygen Sensor(O2) or technically lambda sensor, which feeds the ECU the Air/Fuel ratio of the exhaust gases. The ECU will make corrections in the sub-map so that the Stiochiometric or idea 14.7:1(14.7 parts of air to 1 part of petrol) ratio is kept in check during closed-loop operation(Fuel Economy & Emission control Mode) which happens mainly at idle, light loads or cruising time.

This advance system has a “loop hole” that owners do not realised and manufacturers do not want you to know. Take a general 4 cylinders car as example A, the idea 14.7:1 ratio is the average of all 4 cylinders. IF all 4 cylinders fuel injectors are balanced, it should have 14.7:1 ratio throughout the 4 cylinders, which the ECU will, need minimum fuel trim. Assuming number 1 injector has a little bad spray pattern and its reading is 13.0:1, the other 3 still reads a healthy 14.7:1. The lambda will read 14.3:1(rich) on average and it will lead to the ECU reducing fuel to all 4 injectors simultaneously giving a reading something like this, 13.4, 15.15, 15.15, 15.15 or RICH, LEAN, LEAN, LEAN but the lambda will still be telling ECU Air/fuel mixture is Stiochiometric 14.7 or IDEA!

Another common example B, is clogged injectors. Say, only number 1 injector has average spray pattern but clogged and its reading is 16.0:1, the other 3 still reads healthy 14.7:1. The lambda will read 15.0:1(LEAN) on average and it will lead to the ECU increasing fuel to all 4 injectors simultaneously giving a reading something like 15.6, 14.4. 14.4, 14.4 or LEAN, RICH, RICH, RICH but the lambda will still be telling ECU Air/fuel mixture is Stiochiometric 14.7 or IDEA AGAIN!

These bad injectors scenarios are KILLING your engine softly day by day. You can use the same method of averaging to create the scenario that you want to visualise in your 4 cylinders now. The good news is car manufacturers have set certain tolerances in their ECU parameters in regards to Air/fuel mixture to compensate for these errors during open-loop operations where high load and acceleration happens.


Lambda Reading Vs ECU Tuning Relationship

Now let us get interesting and focus on what is happening to the precious cars of enthusiasts when it is tuned with piggyback fuel controllers or even standalone ECU. I shall cover mainly on open loop tuning which most of us does to gain power and some to save fuel.

In earlier example A, the cylinders read RICH, IDEA, IDEA, IDEA. There is just little chance to get the most power out from this engine as just when 3 of your cylinders are tuned at the Air/Fuel ratio just right for power, no. 1 cylinder will be too rich. Even using wide band lambda, the programmer would not be able to know what is going on in the 4 cylinders since he is targeting for a certain A/F ratio, e.g. 13.0:1 when it is only an average of the 4 cylinders. For those tuning for optimum fuel economy it can only spell disaster for the engine! Assuming the programmer is targeting at 14.6:1, he will need to reduce fuel simultaneously to all 4 cylinders giving a reading something like this, 13.2, 15.13, 15.13, 15.13 which will give him a reading of 14.6:1 on his thousand dollar wide band lambda system. The car owner will be lucky if the engine starts to detonate at those lean burning cylinders and the programmer will target a richer Air/Fuel Ratio instead so that the engine would not need an overhaul within 6 months.

In example B, where injectors clogged up will be another scenario. Those interested can private me and we can discuss this in chat rooms.

Ever wonder why two same cars in rather new condition with the same bigger turbo, injectors, fuel pump, intake, exhaust and ECU programming cannot achieve the same power output? The main difference that sets them apart is in the combustion process and the key lies in the variance of the fuel injectors no matter how much they cost. This question puzzles even some reputable computer programmers and tuners. I do not think it is their fault but due to the lack of proper F.I. diagnostic test bench, there is just no way to know!
 
Re: The “ I ” In E.F.I

Overall a nicely written article, but the details can be misleading.

Firstly, "closed loop" doesn't mean stoichiometric. They are 2 separate ideas. "Closed loop" can be described as a "feedback" system whereby the outcome is used as a correcting parameter to the process under control, in this case, fuel injection. There's nothing to stop the ECU programmer from targeting any AFR during closed loop operation.

Secondly, most modern 4 cylinder pent-roof shaped heads (within the last 10 years) don't go stoichiometric as the AFR target during light load or lean cruise. They run fine with an AFR of 15.5 to 17:1. Running lean under these conditions will not necessarily destroy your engine. The problem with this, is that more oxides of nitrogen is produced and thus it requires a properly functioning EGR and catalytic converter system.

Thirdly, as for uneven reading of AFR... there are a few solutions to this problem. One way is to install a lambda probe into each exhaust outlet, but this is usually too expensive and time consuming. Overkill unless the engine is used in a race. A simpler way is to hook the injector up to an oscilloscope and check the waveform for any anomalies.
 
Re: The “ I ” In E.F.I

Crufty Dusty;169894 said:
Overall a nicely written article, but the details can be misleading.

Firstly, "closed loop" doesn't mean stoichiometric. They are 2 separate ideas. "Closed loop" can be described as a "feedback" system whereby the outcome is used as a correcting parameter to the process under control, in this case, fuel injection. There's nothing to stop the ECU programmer from targeting any AFR during closed loop operation.

Secondly, most modern 4 cylinder pent-roof shaped heads (within the last 10 years) don't go stoichiometric as the AFR target during light load or lean cruise. They run fine with an AFR of 15.5 to 17:1. Running lean under these conditions will not necessarily destroy your engine. The problem with this, is that more oxides of nitrogen is produced and thus it requires a properly functioning EGR and catalytic converter system.

Thirdly, as for uneven reading of AFR... there are a few solutions to this problem. One way is to install a lambda probe into each exhaust outlet, but this is usually too expensive and time consuming. Overkill unless the engine is used in a race. A simpler way is to hook the injector up to an oscilloscope and check the waveform for any anomalies.

Generally most of the cars works like the way I mentioned. It can be clearly seen with a OBD2 hand held scanner. The value oscillates around 1 or 14.7:1 ratio. However if the car uses wide-band O2, it gives the ECU greater control especially during closed-loop control. Narrow-band lambda take 1as the feedback value or 14.7:1, does not give good and precise reading when far out from this range. Whether the tuner can control closed loop opearation really depends which type of aftermarket ECU you are using. For stock ECU, I have not heard of anybody playing with the sub-map. Please advice me if there is any for my own reference ok?

Its wierd why you mentioned about modern 4cyl 16v engines dont run at lambda value of 1 or 14.7:1 since that can be easily verified using a hand held scanner. Due to the nature of the lambda sensor and emission requirements its mandatory. Running at anything higher than 14.7 means more HC, NOx, hotter combustion temperature and shorter engine life. Clogged injector however forces individual cylinders into lean burning the negative way. This does not applies to GDI engines. These engines are running extremely lean air fuel ratio, up to 40:1 at times. Sophisticated piston shape, injection cycle, EGR and low sulphur petrol is necessary for these lean burn to happen yet emission legal. VW groups FSI looks similar to GDI but overcome the potential problems by making it a performance biased engine running at Stoichiometric rather than fuel economy mode. E.U's petrol is generally high in sulphur. BMW and Peugeot-Citroen is developing a new generation of GDI together which is assisted by turbochargers to overcome the problems of existing lean burn engines. The fact remains, lean burning engines causes problem for itself and to the environment.

Yes, there is a up to 12 channels wideband lambda system which can monitor 12cylinders individually and it cost alot! What this write up is looking at is the averaging process the lambda uses in all modern automotives. Oscilloscope will pick up dynamic resistance problem but does not tells you how is the spray pattern, atomisation and static/dynamic flow rate. The simple way to ensure injection is optimum is to physically run them on the testbench dynamically and cost little comparing to other methods. Actually PML was given a injector flow tester which troubleshoots injector flow problems but they does not have the Ultrasonic cleaning system so they simply replaced them with a new set of injectors and charge them to the owner :)
 
Re: The “ I ” In E.F.I

kazeMotorsports;170457 said:
Narrow-band lambda take 1as the feedback value or 14.7:1, does not give good and precise reading when far out from this range. Whether the tuner can control closed loop opearation really depends which type of aftermarket ECU you are using. For stock ECU, I have not heard of anybody playing with the sub-map. Please advice me if there is any for my own reference ok?

No, lambda "1" is not the feedback value. It is the target value in closed loop for certain situations. You cannot know the feedback value beforehand because that's what the O2 sensor is trying to sample. Based on the narrow-band sensor reading, the ECU applies short term and long term fuel trims to arrive at your target. Big difference.

kazeMotorsports;170457 said:
Its wierd why you mentioned about modern 4cyl 16v engines dont run at lambda value of 1 or 14.7:1 since that can be easily verified using a hand held scanner. Due to the nature of the lambda sensor and emission requirements its mandatory. Running at anything higher than 14.7 means more HC, NOx, hotter combustion temperature and shorter engine life. Clogged injector however forces individual cylinders into lean burning the negative way. This does not applies to GDI engines. These engines are running extremely lean air fuel ratio, up to 40:1 at times. Sophisticated piston shape, injection cycle, EGR and low sulphur petrol is necessary for these lean burn to happen yet emission legal. VW groups FSI looks similar to GDI but overcome the potential problems by making it a performance biased engine running at Stoichiometric rather than fuel economy mode. E.U's petrol is generally high in sulphur. BMW and Peugeot-Citroen is developing a new generation of GDI together which is assisted by turbochargers to overcome the problems of existing lean burn engines. The fact remains, lean burning engines causes problem for itself and to the environment.

Please read the original reply again, carefully. The only reason to run at stoich is to satisfy emissions requirements. As explained, a leaner AFR is necessary to realize better fuel economy. Also, "running at anything higher than 14.7" does result in pollutants (which is why the original reply mentioned properly functioning EGR and catalytic converter), but does not equate to "shorter engine life".
 
Re: The “ I ” In E.F.I

Crufty Dusty;170558 said:
No, lambda "1" is not the feedback value. It is the target value in closed loop for certain situations. You cannot know the feedback value beforehand because that's what the O2 sensor is trying to sample. Based on the narrow-band sensor reading, the ECU applies short term and long term fuel trims to arrive at your target. Big difference.


Please read the original reply again, carefully. The only reason to run at stoich is to satisfy emissions requirements. As explained, a leaner AFR is necessary to realize better fuel economy. Also, "running at anything higher than 14.7" does result in pollutants (which is why the original reply mentioned properly functioning EGR and catalytic converter), but does not equate to "shorter engine life".

The Oxygen sensor is not called the lambda by chance, Lambda is 1 and 14.7 and this is the value its designed to pick up and feedback to the ECU. Anything higher is lean and anything lower is rich. No doubts about it. Target value is the job of the ECU not the lambda.

Crufty Dusty;170558 said:
"Secondly, most modern 4 cylinder pent-roof shaped heads (within the last 10 years) don't go stoichiometric as the AFR target during light load or lean cruise. They run fine with an AFR of 15.5 to 17:1. Running lean under these conditions will not necessarily destroy your engine. The problem with this, is that more oxides of nitrogen is produced and thus it requires a properly functioning EGR and catalytic converter system."

I read it 5 times over and over again. What I cannot agree is, "most modern 4 cylinder pent-roof shaped heads (within the last 10 years) don't go stoichiometric as the AFR target during light load or lean cruise. They run fine with an AFR of 15.5 to 17:1."

Somehow agree is, "Running lean under these conditions will not necessarily destroy your engine." 3 out of 5 times it will. Running slightly richer eliminates the risk associated with lean burn. Those tuning for fuel economy should not get leaner than 15.0 just for reference.

Totally agree is, "The problem with this, is that more oxides of nitrogen is produced and thus it requires a properly functioning EGR and catalytic converter system." However even the best EGR, Catalytic convertor out there finds it difficult to substain lean burn for long period of time. BMW is looking at a self rejuvenating system that can handle NOx without problems.

Are you currently involved in engine management programming? I really like to know more people here that is involving in hands on stuff here!
 
Re: The “ I ” In E.F.I

kazeMotorsports;170914 said:
The Oxygen sensor is not called the lambda by chance, Lambda is 1 and 14.7 and this is the value its designed to pick up and feedback to the ECU. Anything higher is lean and anything lower is rich. No doubts about it. Target value is the job of the ECU not the lambda.

Stoichiometry is different for different fuels, but that is not the point. Refer to your original quote and my response.

kazeMotorsports;170914 said:
I read it 5 times over and over again. What I cannot agree is, "most modern 4 cylinder pent-roof shaped heads (within the last 10 years) don't go stoichiometric as the AFR target during light load or lean cruise. They run fine with an AFR of 15.5 to 17:1."

Please refer to Bosch Automotive Handbook, 6th Edition.

kazeMotorsports;170914 said:
Somehow agree is, "Running lean under these conditions will not necessarily destroy your engine." 3 out of 5 times it will. Running slightly richer eliminates the risk associated with lean burn. Those tuning for fuel economy should not get leaner than 15.0 just for reference.

Where did you pull that "3 out of 5 times" figure? Is there any paper that supports this statement?

Also, are you familiar with deceleration fuel cut off? Injectors are totally shut off when the operator goes off the throttle from a high RPM. This is to save fuel. AFR becomes so lean the wideband can't even pick it up accurately. According to you, this would destroy the engine in no time. So could you explain why a large number of OEM ECUs are using this feature?
 
Re: The “ I ” In E.F.I

Crufty Dusty;170920 said:
Stoichiometry is different for different fuels, but that is not the point. Refer to your original quote and my response.



Please refer to Bosch Automotive Handbook, 6th Edition.



Where did you pull that "3 out of 5 times" figure? Is there any paper that supports this statement?

Also, are you familiar with deceleration fuel cut off? Injectors are totally shut off when the operator goes off the throttle from a high RPM. This is to save fuel. AFR becomes so lean the wideband can't even pick it up accurately. According to you, this would destroy the engine in no time. So could you explain why a large number of OEM ECUs are using this feature?

We are talking purely on gasoline engines here. I still stand by my earlier quote.

Sorry but I am afraid I dont have that book as I only have the necessary notes targetting at E.F.I.
However will check that out at ITE when I drop by the school. I am sure that sentence is justified by other factors if it is written in the book.

Yes, its pluck from the sky and its not politically correct to quote that but using "3/5 times" means "Most of the time."

Yes I am very familar with E.F.I and its operations. However I do not do any ECU reprogramming at all and hope to know some here.The purpose is not just to save fuel but again emission control. For my car even engine braking at 3000rpm the injector duty cycle is off. You have answered this question yourself already, the engine is off throttle so technically there is no combustion and no combustion mean cylinder pressure and temperature is not building up. This is also high vacuum mode. :)
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
82,766
Messages
1,019,409
Members
78,670
Latest member
oxbett2com
Back
Top