Problem is scholars usually cannot envisage that...rvt;1060536 said:IMHO, it is a flop.
Spend $4billion (right?) to smoothen traffic on expressway but cause greater jams elsewhere.
At the juncture exiting from MCE, towards Central boulevard, the traffic light placements are inefficiently located. And the lack of proper planning and a yellow box cause these major jams.
(You don't need a scholar to envisage that.)
Vansoh;1060698 said:The view will never be the same ever again....
rvt;1060707 said:I agree that things will improve along the way, that was less of my point.
My questions were more towards:
1) Was there really a need to have MCE? (I have not seen any significant economic benefits... so far.)
2) Our road planners can't foresee obvious choke points and the causes?
rvt;1060707 said:I agree that things will improve along the way, that was less of my point.
My questions were more towards:
1) Was there really a need to have MCE? (I have not seen any significant economic benefits... so far.)
2) Our road planners can't foresee obvious choke points and the causes?
seanskye;1060751 said:Economic benefit, true and not true. Hopefully URA does not flood the market with these new land parcels.
Already, asset values will likely be tested by significant supply quantum from projects such as the KTM-exchanged MOne and others like V, SBF, Oxley etc.
In the event a deflation of asset values in the CBD occurs, coupled together with a rise in cost of leverage, it could spell a remake of problems for the businesses.
Too much uncertainty right now to say. For the long term, however, it is definitely a good thing for the country.
N54toN47;1060724 said:a1 The MCE was constructed to free up land for the new downtown. Much of the land has not been developed yet except certain sections like where ORQ and Asia Square and MBFC are at.
a2 The choke points were a result of motorists not knowing that ECP no longer connects to the AYE (even though it was publicised. )