delrosa81;621426 said:Unless the 2004 318i is in good working condition with all worn parts replaced, else I would advise u to keep ur cerato.
Ah_Bock;621429 said:Hi delrosa,
You know of any workshop that can do a check on e car? And how much will they charge?
Ah_Bock;621478 said:Really don't know to follow my head or follow my heart.....
pongster;621507 said:hi, keep the Kia it makes more economical sense... a 2004 ride might gives u lots of headaches n servicing issues... KIA is up n coming brand, look at the new K5... already pushing those Toyotas n Hondas to their limits.... ;p
ac323;621510 said:Do you mean Vios and City?
cheers
Why does 2004 ride might gives lots of headaches & servicing issues?pongster;621507 said:hi, keep the Kia it makes more economical sense... a 2004 ride might gives u lots of headaches n servicing issues... KIA is up n coming brand, look at the new K5... already pushing those Toyotas n Hondas to their limits.... ;p
davidtch;621512 said:Why does 2004 ride might gives lots of headaches & servicing issues?
davidtch;621512 said:Why does 2004 ride might gives lots of headaches & servicing issues?
pongster;621511 said:Hi Alvin,
think those Korean-made cars are getting more stylish... tried the 3.6L V6 sport coupe Hyundai in Chengdu and I am more impressed by them (design, pricing, advancement)... thot that the K5 wins over the Honda accord and Toyota camry anytime...
Even the K-pop is over those J-pop! haha![]()
ac323;621514 said:Hi david,
i think Eric is worried if the ride is high mileage than the Gb might give way any time....the rest should be those wear and tear parts ba................as compared to his 2010 much newer ride........of course if Ah Bock is prepare to come up some $ for all this potential wear and tear then should be ok to go for it............( comparing a 2004 ride over a 2010 ride for this case )
cheers