Conti(s) need to keep up

[Baby1M]

Looks like the article states openly one of the true acronym of BMW i.e. Bring More Worries. Consolation is BMW is standing at 25th, above Audi amd Merc.

Full Article: Japanese brands lead reliability survey | carsguide.com.au

Summaried car brand reliability - in failure rate
1. Honda 10%
2. Toyota 17%
3. Lexus 18%
4. Suzuki 19%
5. Subaru 20%
6. Hyundai 21%
6. Mazda 21%
6. Mitsubishi 21%
9. Chevrolet 22%
10. Nissan 25%
11. Kia 26%
12. Ford 31%
12. Skoda 31%
14. Citro#adien 32%
15. Peugeot 35%
15. Daewoo 35%
15. Smart 35%
18. Mini 37%
19. Fiat 38%
20. Seat 39%
20. Volkswagen 39%
20. Volvo 39%
20. Porsche 39%
24. Vauxhall 40%
25. BMW 41%
26. Audi 42%
27. Rover 43%
27. Jaguar 49,630 184 43%
29. Mercedes-Benz 53,386 215 45%

Own take away: Indeed my current ride is giving me more 'broken parts' than my previous RWD Jappy (with alot of 'throttle abuse' too)... comparing mileage and age-for-age of ride.

 

[wt_know]

Re: Conti(s) need to keep up

BMW 41% only? i expect 60% failure rate especially when the car reaching 3 years old or 100k mileage ...
that means BMW had done well ... LOL

 

[furiouseight]

Re: Conti(s) need to keep up

Survey done to Honda customers right after they had bought their car.

 

[MW]

Re: Conti(s) need to keep up

U go survey those who just bought their BMWs and all will tell u Best buy Best car